Fashion Police - What would you ban?

Keep out STUPID ZONE These posts although amusing belong no where else
Starshine
Master Wizard
 
Posts: 1515
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 4:40 pm
Location: UK

Fashion Police - What would you ban?

Postby Starshine on Wed Jun 04, 2008 8:17 pm

Imagine you are made Chief Superintendent of the Fashion Police for one day. You can ban one thing fashion-wise. What would you ban?

I am Chief Superintendent Starshine I am going to ban skirts worn with trousers!

I now resign as Superintendent. Next Superintendent please!

tobinfest
Mahatma
 
Posts: 1156
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 6:57 pm
Location: USA

Postby tobinfest on Thu Jun 05, 2008 6:44 pm

Superintendent Tobinfest at your service.

Fashion police, I would ban boys wearing their pants around their thighs and letting their boxer shorts show. Too much information!!!!

Females who do the same would get a written warning and after they accumulate 50-100 of these, then we will CRACK down. :lol:

This might be a little sexist, but I don't care. After all I am the Superintendent. Now resigning. Next?

User avatar
Sharon den Adel
Heroine
 
Posts: 6447
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 10:24 am
Location: In Sharon's Heart

Postby Sharon den Adel on Fri Jun 06, 2008 8:30 am

I would ban people from wearing too tight tops that makes their tummys squish over their jeans. We call them 'muffins' over here. :wink:

Next!
Don't have to be afraid
A tear is only water, a sigh is only air
Whenever you feel haunted
Truth lies out there

User avatar
Ruth5
Demigod
 
Posts: 8425
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 12:51 pm
Location: West Country

Postby Ruth5 on Fri Jun 06, 2008 11:48 am

Girls who wear tights with trainers.
Guys whos jeans hang around to far below their bums.

User avatar
jinjin
Supreme Goddess First Class
 
Posts: 90103
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:44 pm
Location: Mahou Shoujo University

Postby jinjin on Sat Jun 07, 2008 4:58 am

I would ban all cover-up that is not painted on the body.
Image

tobinfest
Mahatma
 
Posts: 1156
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 6:57 pm
Location: USA

Postby tobinfest on Sat Jun 07, 2008 1:30 pm

Superintendant Tobinfest, back on duty.

This will probably irritate some, (sorry) but I would ban those mulitple piercings along both eyebrows and the six or so in each ear. Many are into them. I really do not like them. Banned!

Next?

User avatar
boingo
Seraphim
 
Posts: 18838
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 9:34 am
Location: Perth, Western Australia (GMT+9hours for daylight "savings")

Postby boingo on Wed Jun 25, 2008 8:33 am

No sports shoes without socks.
No socks with sandals.
No sandals for men.
No flip flops.
None deck shoes (boat shoes) -They're the fuggliest footwear ever invented. Ugly!
No Crocs shoes photo
No vests or other ugly thermal underwear. bad taste!
No Y-fronts
Pretty much 90% of the clothing available for men in Western Australian stores should also be banned because it's fuggly!
“Only until all of mankind lives in harmony with nature can we trully decree oursleves as an intelligent species.”
-Genelle Haldane

tobinfest
Mahatma
 
Posts: 1156
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 6:57 pm
Location: USA

Postby tobinfest on Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:46 am

mesh pantyhose or stockings, unless only for sex.
To trampy for business use.
Sorry. My two cents.

User avatar
Joyofsox
Demigod
 
Posts: 8492
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:19 am
Location: Mongville-on-Edge.

Postby Joyofsox on Sun Jun 29, 2008 11:06 pm

Shorts and leggings, although shorts and tights is a combination nearly as bad.

tobinfest
Mahatma
 
Posts: 1156
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 6:57 pm
Location: USA

Postby tobinfest on Tue Jul 08, 2008 3:00 pm

baseball hats, worn to the side or backwards. The visor is intended to keep the sun out of your eyes, not your ears or your neck!

User avatar
honbuns
Priestess
 
Posts: 802
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 12:54 pm

Postby honbuns on Wed Jul 09, 2008 10:22 am

Piercings other ears and especially those tunnel peircings.

Tatoos.

Jeans that are in shreds or look like they have used when decorating the house and the wearing a skirt over trousers thing just looks daft.

tobinfest
Mahatma
 
Posts: 1156
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 6:57 pm
Location: USA

Postby tobinfest on Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:54 pm

Agree with honbuns about tatoos, which will rile some on this site.
I know that it is a staement, but to me, the statement says "I guess I don't want to work for you".
I dealt with a young (25 years old) girl, wanting to rent a rental house. Short skirt (hot!), buxomy (hot!) and then tatoos up both sides of her neck and under her chin. (Ugh!) My wife was impressed (not!).
She needs financial assistance, which we cannot do for her, but, at the same time, she had the money, (not cheap) to get all these tatoos. This is my bias and perhaps you all disagree. Get the butterfly on your butt, if you must, but at least it is covered.
My two cents, take it or leave it, please. If you want body art, so be it, but it might affect your ability to get or maintain employment, self inflicted.


Return to Stupid Zone

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests