. wrote:G Wizzard,
Did the low and tight operation cause you reduced sexual sensitivity? Is it harder to masturbate
I dunno, man. I don't seem to have any regrets in the sexual sensitivity department. M@sturbation isn't a challenge at all. Either I glide gently over it (esp the ridge of the glans) or I use a lube of some sort. No biggie.
I was annoyed that he trimmed off as much as he did, and other minor cosmetic gripes. But on the whole, it's great.
If I knew then what I know now, I would have consulted with more surgeons and discussed a slightly different plan. Like a high/tight.
I'm interested in getting a low / tight circumcision but concerned about reduced sex pleasure.
Why a low/tight? Why not a high/tight?
Fwiw, I stumbled across this site (courtesy of context-sensitive advertising in Gmail):
http://www.circumcisioncenter.com/~*~ G Wiz ~*~
I'm the one with the wizard's hat and robe.
When did ignorance become a point of view?
. wrote:G Wizard,
Thanks for the website link above.
I think low / tight looks best, and provides better STD protection, however I understand it reduces sensitivity compared to high / tight? If there's a big difference in sensitivity between the two styles, might be best to go for the high / tight?
Guest 25 wrote:Hi All
I Had my circumcision 9 days ago and so far it is going quite well. I had it done on the NHS in England and this particular urologist did not put any bandages on, it was sutured up and thats it...so far so good.
I was slightly concerned about a small bubble/lump on the inferior aspect of the wound line...however upon reading _ discovered that this was okay as it was most likely vessals which were tied off.
I decided to celebrate on day 7 and go out and have a drink. Must have had a bit too much as when i awoke the part near the frenulum looked scabby and had bled a little. The sutured skin looked like it had come off a little. Also it wasnt as dry as it was before and just around this small area near were frenulum it looks a bit wet and smells a bit. Although it does not look like an open wound, no other signs of infection or pain...wasnt sure if this is normal and something to be expected...
Mr. Snicket wrote:I am a 17 year old Toronto resident hoping to get circumcised by the end of next week. I haven't consulted a doctor yet (I'm just hoping it won't take too long to set up an appointment and procedure). I have a slight case of phimosis. By that I mean the head of the penis can usually just escape the skin but is difficult to pull back and just impractical to sustain (the pain is unbearable).
I read almost all the posts and they were all extremely helpful -- seriously, these two pages answered more questions than the past years of research.
However, I'm wondering if OHIP will cover it. And if not, how much would the procedure cost?
Either way, I'm getting the procedure done. The skin is a burden I've had to bear all my life and even stretching or a small cut would seem practical to me, at least not to my penis.
I'm also wondering if there are age requirements for the operation (a la what age can it be done, does it require parental conscent). And do you know what the operation would entail? Would I be unconscience? And what exactly are these high/short (etc.) variations? Do you have images to show the difference?
Sorry, I tend to ramble. Thanks for reading!
brettw903 wrote:Has anyone in America had this done on the forum? approximately how much did it cost? And if anyone has had it done by a doctor in the dallas tx area please let me know
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests