Do you prefer men who are circumcised? (Please leave reason)
Yes
46%
[ 21 ]
No
13%
[ 6 ]
I don't have a preference
40%
[ 18 ]
Total Votes : 45
Author
Message
Bouncy FemaleFirst Guru
Joined: 28 Nov 2005 Posts: 12727 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 7:35 pm Post subject:
I prefer circumsized. It is up to the man to decide whether or not he does as well. My wants aren't forced on anyone.
I prefer my breasts on the large side. It's up to the man to decide whether or not he does as well. His wants aren't forced on me. He's free to walk away from them if he so chooses.
The guy who was pressured into getting circumsized in order to marry the bride of his choice was well within his rights to object and not get it done. The cost of marriage to this woman was his foreskin. He may not have been willing to pay that price, but he did anyway. He chose to be circumsized. He could have walked away intact.
Joined: 01 Dec 2005 Posts: 1072 Location: near Dallas, Texas, USA, planet Earth
Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 10:52 pm Post subject:
Not true.
As someone who was uncut for the first 29 years of my life, one of my prime objectives for getting my circumcision was no longer having to deal with the smegma.
I could wash in the shower with soap and water in the morning, and by early evening it would be back. Bloody annoying.
And now? No longer do I suffer from "head cheese".
I am a 22yr female living in US and married at the age of 20. My husband, 35, was uncut when we started dating five years back. I forced him to circumcize after our marriage. He has a low and tight cut, his inner skin and frenulum is totally removed. Cutting foreskin de-sensitizes the glan. In my husband's case it became dry and partially numb . The major advantage is due to lack of sensitivity on the penis-head he vigorously strokes inside me in order to achive the desired level of pleasure and can last much longer than before. It has become a little rough ride , but that's a kind of sex I was looking for. Many women may not like this.
Secondly it's great for the oral sex. It was impossible to have oral due to odor when he was un-cut.
Liz M
That's because he couldn't take care of himself. He had no idea how to wash an uncut penis.
As someone who was uncut for the first 29 years of my life, one of my prime objectives for getting my circumcision was no longer having to deal with the smegma.
I could wash in the shower with soap and water in the morning, and by early evening it would be back. Bloody annoying.
And now? No longer do I suffer from "head cheese".
LMAO well 'G Wizard', I can tell you now, that you had a serious problem.
I wash my bellend every morning, as I should, and it doesn't smell of anything, and it stays that way all throughout the day.
Also, foreskins can be very handy. In me teenage days when I used to smoke hash, sometimes the Police would pull up, and if I caught an early glimps of them before they caught up with me, I could hide the bit of hash I had under my foreskin, just incase they might search me LOL.
Hiding hash in your foreskin; something to be proud of.
It had cling film wrapped around it. Still, stopped me from getting in trouble, didn't it?
OH!! That's different then! In that case, it makes you look ever so clever.
In any case, I think I'd prefer someone who was "clean" than someone who used their foreskin to cover their crimes.
Well, it was clever, as I could have been arrested otherwise. Sticking it in my anus, now that would have been stupid.
lol you're completely twisting what I had said about using my foreskin to hide the hash I had. Originally I just threw it in as a light hearted comment to show why a foreskin is better , it was meant in a purely commical sense, although I did do it. But that was about 10 years ago when I was 15 and I am completely THC free now, and have been for about 8 years. Just so you know.
Just because I once hid some hash in my foreskin it doesn't mean I don't have a clean penis, you dozey fool.
Joined: 01 Dec 2005 Posts: 1072 Location: near Dallas, Texas, USA, planet Earth
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 10:17 pm Post subject:
. wrote:
LMAO well 'G Wizard', I can tell you now, that you had a serious problem.
I'm glad my condition was worth a 'LMAO' from you. And I'm glad you thought it was a serious problem. Because it wasn't.
Or, if you think that was serious, you have a strange perception of what 'serious' is.
Quote:
I wash my bellend every morning, as I should, and it doesn't smell of anything, and it stays that way all throughout the day.
And mine smelled quite acceptable all day as well. I never said smell was ever an issue.
Go back and read my post again to better understand the words I wrote.
Wait, I'll save you the trouble. Smegma is that natural |ubricant which you're no doubt familiar with. No doubt if left alone for a month without washing, it would probably start to acquire a funky smell.
To recap what I wrote, I didn't say anything about smell, nor did I say I left it alone for a month.
I said that I could wash it clean in the morning, and by evening the smegma would be back. And that, to me, was a nuisance.
Now if in your case you can scrub yourself clean in the morning, and still not have even the slightest hint of smegma in the evening, congratulations, and welcome to the human condition known as "individual variation". Based on that, you could probably go a week without scrubbing. Of course, the bacteria would still start to grow, and hence the smell....
Quote:
Also, foreskins can be very handy.
This has got to be the best line I've heard this week.
LMAO well 'G Wizard', I can tell you now, that you had a serious problem.
I'm glad my condition was worth a 'LMAO' from you. And I'm glad you thought it was a serious problem. Because it wasn't.
Or, if you think that was serious, you have a strange perception of what 'serious' is.
Oh it definitely was worth a LMAO. It was serious enough for you to get the snip, wasn't it?
Quote:
And mine smelled quite acceptable all day as well. I never said smell was ever an issue.
Go back and read my post again to better understand the words I wrote.
Wait, I'll save you the trouble. Smegma is that natural |ubricant which you're no doubt familiar with. No doubt if left alone for a month without washing, it would probably start to acquire a funky smell.
To recap what I wrote, I didn't say anything about smell, nor did I say I left it alone for a month.
I said that I could wash it clean in the morning, and by evening the smegma would be back. And that, to me, was a nuisance.
Now if in your case you can scrub yourself clean in the morning, and still not have even the slightest hint of smegma in the evening, congratulations, and welcome to the human condition known as "individual variation". Based on that, you could probably go a week without scrubbing. Of course, the bacteria would still start to grow, and hence the smell....
Yes that's right..."natural".
Why would something that didn't smell be a nuisance to you? Don't say it's more hygienic for God sake. If it doesn't smell then girls aren't going to care, as it's the smell that puts them off. I suppose we should just completely remove our finger nails as bacteria can harbor underneath them...? You should have just used some 'common sense' and wiped your bellend on your boxers every now and then, instead of having your foreskin chopped off.
Quote:
This has got to be the best line I've heard this week.
Penn and Teller would be proud of you.
You must live a very boring life then, oh well, we're only in Monday, still all week to go.
Well, it was clever, as I could have been arrested otherwise. Sticking it in my anus, now that would have been stupid.
Right. Because a proper rubber-gloved cavity search would somehow overlook your foreskin.
No dozey, I'm talking about when they search me on the street. They'd have to arrest me to give me a cavity search, and the point is; me hiding it underneath my foreskin means they can't find it in a basic, run-of-the-mill search that they carry out on the street.