Celebrity News...
  1. Lindsay Lohan's Playboy snub
  2. 'Crazy' actress Keira Knightley
  3. Kim Kardashian's musical ambition
  4. Gwen Stefani's strong marriage
Entertainment...
  1. Kanye West Returns To Vma Stage A Year After Boycott Threat.
  2. Beckhams Celebrate Son's Star-studded Birthday.
  3. Guy Ritchie Bars Madonna From Fast Cars.
  4. LL Cool J To Tour With Jackson.
Latest Music...
  1. Ironik’s New Single Stay With Me
  2. The Best Of Creedence Clearwater Revival
  3. Black Kids New Album Partie Traumatic
  4. Paul Heaton New Album The Cross Eyed Rambler
Movie Reviews...
  1. Katyn
  2. Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired
  3. The Heckler
  4. Cinema's Action Women


Female First Forum Forum Index
Does a potential husband have a right to know?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 9, 10, 11  Next  
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Female First Forum Forum Index -> Relationship

Does a potential husband have a right to know if you have had an abortion?
Yes, he has the right to know.
53%
 53%  [ 17 ]
No. he does not have the right to know.
46%
 46%  [ 15 ]
Total Votes : 32

Author Message
MaxtheGaul
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 3475
Location: London

PostPosted: Wed May 07, 2008 5:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Guys, you have to understand Fred is a prototype. It is a computer not a person. The reason "he" won't answer questions about himself is that "he" doesn't exist. It is a program designed to roughly interpret what people are posting and respond with a set of canned responses.

Actually the software is quite good and has clearly fooled a few people, but you can see from analysing the responses that the vocabulary is very limited and the analytical ability is clearly sub-human.

Nevertheless a brave attempt and I commend Fred's creator.
Back to top
coolman
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 18 Apr 2008
Posts: 6067


PostPosted: Wed May 07, 2008 5:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Polgara69 wrote:
Ask my dad who got custody when my mother walked out when I was a baby.


you just gave him so much more fuel, sweetheart. Now he's gonna come back with some crude remark about your upbringing, etc.
Back to top
coolman
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 18 Apr 2008
Posts: 6067


PostPosted: Wed May 07, 2008 5:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

coolman wrote:
coolman wrote:
oh you insipid little man.


don't worry, I'll wait while you look it up in the dictionary.


what? No response?

I'm glad you finally agree!
Back to top
ZiaAries
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 13363
Location: United States of America

PostPosted: Wed May 07, 2008 6:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MaxtheGaul wrote:
Guys, you have to understand Fred is a prototype. It is a computer not a person. The reason "he" won't answer questions about himself is that "he" doesn't exist. It is a program designed to roughly interpret what people are posting and respond with a set of canned responses.

Actually the software is quite good and has clearly fooled a few people, but you can see from analysing the responses that the vocabulary is very limited and the analytical ability is clearly sub-human.

Nevertheless a brave attempt and I commend Fred's creator.

Worship



Max, Are you a good kisser? Razz
Back to top
Fred75
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 04 Oct 2007
Posts: 7470


PostPosted: Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

coolman wrote:
coolman wrote:
coolman wrote:
oh you insipid little man.


don't worry, I'll wait while you look it up in the dictionary.


what? No response?

I'm glad you finally agree!


Talking to yourself?????? Shocked
Back to top
DanMc
FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)


Joined: 29 Jan 2008
Posts: 1386
Location: UK

PostPosted: Wed May 07, 2008 9:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MaxtheGaul wrote:
Guys, you have to understand Fred is a prototype. It is a computer not a person. The reason "he" won't answer questions about himself is that "he" doesn't exist. It is a program designed to roughly interpret what people are posting and respond with a set of canned responses.

Actually the software is quite good and has clearly fooled a few people, but you can see from analysing the responses that the vocabulary is very limited and the analytical ability is clearly sub-human.

Nevertheless a brave attempt and I commend Fred's creator.

He's right you know Wink
Back to top
Cambridge
FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)


Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 1273


PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2008 4:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Of course, for HB to be real he’d have to have a real, innovative thought. That, for him, is an alien concept.
Back to top
noodles
FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)


Joined: 04 Sep 2006
Posts: 1891


PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2008 11:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="ZiaAries"]
MaxtheGaul wrote:
Guys, you have to understand Fred is a prototype. It is a computer not a person. The reason "he" won't answer questions about himself is that "he" doesn't exist. It is a program designed to roughly interpret what people are posting and respond with a set of canned responses.

Actually the software is quite good and has clearly fooled a few people, but you can see from analysing the responses that the vocabulary is very limited and the analytical ability is clearly sub-human.

Nevertheless a brave attempt and I commend Fred's creator.

Worship





Absolutely. I feel such a fool. It was so obvious. Clap


Lets hope they upgrade him soon Laughing
Back to top
MaxtheGaul
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 3475
Location: London

PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2008 7:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the last "upgrade" wasn't properly tested and resulted in a pile of spelling and grammatical problems. I also noticed that the responses had become more random, probably an attempt to add pseudo-emotion.
Back to top
Fred75
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 04 Oct 2007
Posts: 7470


PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2008 8:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ERROR!
ERROR!
ERROR!

DOES NOT COMPUTE!
DOES NOT COMPUTE!
Back to top
zinnia
FemaleFirst Senior Member (500+ Posts)


Joined: 12 Nov 2007
Posts: 790


PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2008 2:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

MaxtheGaul wrote:
Guys, you have to understand Fred is a prototype. It is a computer not a person. The reason "he" won't answer questions about himself is that "he" doesn't exist. It is a program designed to roughly interpret what people are posting and respond with a set of canned responses.

Actually the software is quite good and has clearly fooled a few people, but you can see from analysing the responses that the vocabulary is very limited and the analytical ability is clearly sub-human.

Nevertheless a brave attempt and I commend Fred's creator.
Clap Clap Very Happy
Back to top
Sharon den Adel
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 02 Mar 2008
Posts: 6381
Location: In Sharon's Heart

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2008 9:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fred75 wrote:
Sharon den Adel wrote:
Fred75 wrote:
Not her child.
Her decision to have sex with a guy she knew nothing about or even had a commitment with!


Her decision as to who she has sex with and when is up to her, and not for you to say.


This is true.
The child's rights NEVER should be considered.
Whether it be the need for a good father or the right to live or die from abortion.
Because SEX is a right and damn the actual consequences of an adult act.

In both cases the rights of the mother rights supersedes everything else.


The mothers rights will always come before a fetus. While the baby is inside her, it has no rights, the mother has control, and that is the way it should be.

Sometimes I think you wish you were a woman, Fred. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
Fred75
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 04 Oct 2007
Posts: 7470


PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2008 12:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sharon den Adel wrote:
Fred75 wrote:
Sharon den Adel wrote:
Fred75 wrote:
Not her child.
Her decision to have sex with a guy she knew nothing about or even had a commitment with!


Her decision as to who she has sex with and when is up to her, and not for you to say.


This is true.
The child's rights NEVER should be considered.
Whether it be the need for a good father or the right to live or die from abortion.
Because SEX is a right and damn the actual consequences of an adult act.

In both cases the rights of the mother rights supersedes everything else.


The mothers rights will always come before a fetus. While the baby is inside her, it has no rights, the mother has control, and that is the way it should be.

Sometimes I think you wish you were a woman, Fred. Rolling Eyes


So then... you agree that, if and when the GAY gene is found, a mother has the right to have those gay cells sucked out and washed down the sink?
Back to top
Polgara69
FemaleFirst Senior Member (500+ Posts)


Joined: 16 Nov 2007
Posts: 751
Location: Leicester

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2008 7:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh my word. Someone tie my hands down please!
Back to top
ZiaAries
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 13363
Location: United States of America

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2008 7:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Polgara69 wrote:
Oh my word. Someone tie my hands down please!


Fred just gets sexier by the minute. What a hunk of burning love he must be. Roll On The Floor Laugh My Arse Off
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Female First Forum Forum Index -> Relationship All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 9, 10, 11  Next
Page 10 of 11

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
terms and conditions Latest Posts