Moderator: Silent One

A Father wrote:Colonel,
Sarah Hart has written a book to help women, but the issues she lists in her recent post would apply equally to fathers. Unfortunately for the children, some parents of both genders try to shut the other parent out for various reasons, mostly becasue they want nothing to do with their ex-spouse. Unless there are extenuating circumstances (such as child abuse) it is equally wrong for either parent to shut the other out of their children's lives. The big difference is that because many more mothers than fathers have custody of their children, more fathers than mothers are being shut out of their children's lives.
Their is also the emotional issue of "maternal bonding." Being a male, I have never personally experienced this, but most of the literature on child bearing states that a mother forms a very close bond with her baby as soon as she holds the baby the first time. If the mother does not hold the baby, this bond does not form. A similar bond does not normally form between a father and his child. Thus a mother who is separated from her child has to deal with emotional problems the father who is separated from his child does not experience.
I will admit I have never gone to Sarah Hart's web site, but my bottom line here is that I do not see any bias in her post.
A Father

The Colonel wrote:A Father wrote:Colonel,
Sarah Hart has written a book to help women, but the issues she lists in her recent post would apply equally to fathers. Unfortunately for the children, some parents of both genders try to shut the other parent out for various reasons, mostly becasue they want nothing to do with their ex-spouse. Unless there are extenuating circumstances (such as child abuse) it is equally wrong for either parent to shut the other out of their children's lives. The big difference is that because many more mothers than fathers have custody of their children, more fathers than mothers are being shut out of their children's lives.
Their is also the emotional issue of "maternal bonding." Being a male, I have never personally experienced this, but most of the literature on child bearing states that a mother forms a very close bond with her baby as soon as she holds the baby the first time. If the mother does not hold the baby, this bond does not form. A similar bond does not normally form between a father and his child. Thus a mother who is separated from her child has to deal with emotional problems the father who is separated from his child does not experience.
I will admit I have never gone to Sarah Hart's web site, but my bottom line here is that I do not see any bias in her post.
A Father
As a father of four (plus a bump) an emotional bond EQUAL to a mothers bond forms.
It is not greater with either, and I see much bias in her post.
Her book/site is to do with mothers. Why not fathers? Why not mothers and fathers?
The bottom line is that women can kick and scream and try and get what they want, they are always the victim. The man never matters.
If the woman gets the kids, she's the victim of the "nasty, nasty man". If she doesn't get the kids then she is the victim of the same.
Captain wrote:The Colonel wrote:A Father wrote:Colonel,
Sarah Hart has written a book to help women, but the issues she lists in her recent post would apply equally to fathers. Unfortunately for the children, some parents of both genders try to shut the other parent out for various reasons, mostly becasue they want nothing to do with their ex-spouse. Unless there are extenuating circumstances (such as child abuse) it is equally wrong for either parent to shut the other out of their children's lives. The big difference is that because many more mothers than fathers have custody of their children, more fathers than mothers are being shut out of their children's lives.
Their is also the emotional issue of "maternal bonding." Being a male, I have never personally experienced this, but most of the literature on child bearing states that a mother forms a very close bond with her baby as soon as she holds the baby the first time. If the mother does not hold the baby, this bond does not form. A similar bond does not normally form between a father and his child. Thus a mother who is separated from her child has to deal with emotional problems the father who is separated from his child does not experience.
I will admit I have never gone to Sarah Hart's web site, but my bottom line here is that I do not see any bias in her post.
A Father
As a father of four (plus a bump) an emotional bond EQUAL to a mothers bond forms.
It is not greater with either, and I see much bias in her post.
Her book/site is to do with mothers. Why not fathers? Why not mothers and fathers?
The bottom line is that women can kick and scream and try and get what they want, they are always the victim. The man never matters.
If the woman gets the kids, she's the victim of the "nasty, nasty man". If she doesn't get the kids then she is the victim of the same.
oooh how far along is your Wife? do you guys know if its a boy or girl yet? your other 4 are boys right?

Captain wrote:No I didn't see that comment but I think it's a pretty horrible thing to say.
I bet she's hoping for a girl!! talk about outnumbered![]()
I found out today i'm expecting a little boy which is pretty exciting.

Captain wrote:I agree that men are discriminated against in regards to children.
Nah haven't really thought of any names yet we had a few shortlisted for girls but can never find any we like for boys. We did think Ryan was okay because it means "little king"![]()
Luckily I've got 4 months to go because otherwise i'd be screwed. It's something I don't take lightly this naming business.
Congrats to you and your wife

mummy of three wrote:i feel the same way about my expartner if you can Call him that i have two beutifull girls to him which he has never emotionally or financially cared for also he never wanted to be named the legal father of so he didnt want to pay child surpport for them,ill never giv my children to him for he is an addict to alsorts ,he also has four other children to two other women that he didnt care for he use to pick them up and leve for me to care for when he had access
![]()
Not only that when he found out that i wanted to lev the country in the best interest of my children and me for surpport with my family![]()
he was able to fight it under fathers rights act i still cant understand it ,so im going through this at the moment which is really unfair,also i nearly lost my children because of false accusations given to cyfs about him being here.also finaces.cuse i get a DPB of 240pw and thats surpose to help levz 90-80 for food after bills r paid.
He has a job god knows were his earnings go to but nafing goes to his kids or to a house thats his, just his car.
sooooo yeeeaahh im tryna get help from some organisations but the goverment is all up the wack.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests