Celebrity News...
  1. Madonna to divorce Guy
  2. Ursula Andress' illness shock
  3. Alicia Keys' Awards blitz
  4. Madonna to divorce Guy
Entertainment...
  1. Steven Spielberg Returns To Universal
  2. Arnold Schwarzenegger Declares State Of Emergency
  3. Janet Jackson ordered to scrap more shows
  4. Avril Lavigne and Deryck Whibley put on united front
Latest Music...
  1. Ironik’s New Single Stay With Me
  2. The Best Of Creedence Clearwater Revival
  3. Black Kids New Album Partie Traumatic
  4. Paul Heaton New Album The Cross Eyed Rambler
Movie Reviews...
  1. Katyn
  2. Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired
  3. The Heckler
  4. Cinema's Action Women


Female First Forum Forum Index
reverend wright interview with Bill Moyers
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next  
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Female First Forum Forum Index -> Politics And Social Issues
Author Message
ZiaAries
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 14110
Location: United States of America

PostPosted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 11:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cambridge wrote:

But how does it help Obama to keep the thing in the news…more opportunity for news channels to run the bites over and over. I think Wright is doing this for selfish reasons, and he has no collusion with the Obama campaign.


I think Obama should rethink this man's loyalty. He all but call Obama two-faced. But then again.... maybe the same difference. As Wright said "but he's a politician."
Back to top
Cambridge
FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)


Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 1619


PostPosted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 1:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Who among them isn’t a politician, zia? On that aspect, Wright was right on. Are McCain or Hillary not a politician? Wright was distancing himself not only from Obama, but from all of them. That’s what I said…Wright has his own agenda, and it doesn’t include the interests of Obama. He is only hurting Obama.

You keep suckering me into this debate that has me supporting Obama. He is not my candidate. But I wonder…if you can box me into this role so easily, maybe I'm missing something about my own sympathies. Nah, Nader forever! Laughing
Back to top
Lena
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 30 Apr 2004
Posts: 28799
Location: Kentucky , USA

PostPosted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Was funny when Wright said how he was in the marines for 6 years then joked about chaney never serving............... Laughing

Still think what he said about damming America was stupid especially when soldiers are fighting & dying for America.

Also still say the Democrats should raise hell about that religious entertainer Hagee supporting McCain and someone /anyone wud howl about the traitors like wolfowitz & perle who came up with the idea for attacking Iraq not to defend America but to help israel
Back to top
ZiaAries
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 14110
Location: United States of America

PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 1:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What is Wright's agenda? I listen to him and I'm wondering what Martin Luther King would think about this man. He is not a unifier in any form.
Back to top
Cambridge
FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)


Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 1619


PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 2:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ZiaAries wrote:
What is Wright's agenda? I listen to him and I'm wondering what Martin Luther King would think about this man. He is not a unifier in any form.

Well, neither, for that matter, was MLK. But no matter…Wright is a divider, as you imply. His agenda is not only to justify himself, but to underscore his message…which we’ve just learned is an anathema to middle America. I think that Obama must disavow this loose canon completely.
Back to top
ZiaAries
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 14110
Location: United States of America

PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 2:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I couldn't disagree with you more about King.


Next.....
Back to top
Cambridge
FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)


Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 1619


PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 2:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Zia, if we disagree, it is one of the most interesting disagreement in history. The dialectic between the peace value and the conflict (or justice) value has become the major debate in the early 21st-ctintury. The peace value arose at the end of WWII, with the advent of the United Nations in San Francisco. Take a look at Article 2 and Article 51 of the United Nations Charter. It says, peace at all costs. That was the prevailing norm until GWB and the present neocons made the argument, at the UN, incidentally, that preemptive strikes were justified. That is the conflict value.

Now I don’t want to abstract Martin Luther King to geopolitical proportions, but he was saying the same thing. Civil disobedience was a kind of conflict value, cloaked in non-violence so that it didn’t look aggressive. But aggressive it was. I would agree that Wright does not even begin to reach the proportions of MLK, but we don’t do Dr. King justice by misunderstanding what he was doing. Change comes from conflict. That is why it is still around.

Oh, and if this looks like I support the neocons, let me state that things have to have a purpose. Have you noticed my use of the word "purposelessness”—as in this war has no “purpose?" A preemptive strike has to have a clear purpose with a definitive tactical scheme and an explicit end game. Think Nelson at Trafalgar; think Napoleon in Poland; think Israel in 1967. Now take a look at Iraq. Now do you see what a mess these idiots have made? Clearly, amateurs. And McCain, who buys in…don’t get me started.
Back to top
ZiaAries
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 14110
Location: United States of America

PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

For Cambridge
Back to top
Cambridge
FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)


Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 1619


PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Erm, what...? Very Happy Well, it’s getting close to 8:30 pm, my bedtime. So gotta go, zia. Chat soon…. Yawning Sleep

Last edited by Cambridge on Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:35 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Big Ben
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 4747


PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Having wright and King in the same discussion is a leading indicator of wright setting race relations back 40 years to the 60s.

wright didn't just become the guy who spoke at the national press club overnight; he's held these beliefs for decades. O'Bumma found these beliefs so objectionable that he stuck around listening to them for 20 years.... Rolling Eyes
Back to top
ZiaAries
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 14110
Location: United States of America

PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 6:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Big Ben wrote:
Having wright and King in the same discussion is a leading indicator of wright setting race relations back 40 years to the 60s.


Amen to that Ben.

Why is the media giving this man so much attention? America hasn't kept him down with his 10 million dollar mansion under construction. Not bad for a church minister. Obama should purchase this guy a one way ticket to somewhere and not bring him back until after the election.
Back to top
myron myron
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 5915


PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 8:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Obama committed political suicide with that denigrating comment about small-town whites who favor religion and guns.

Obama's close friendship with unrepentant Weather Underground terrorists will hurt him badly as well.

Compared to the above, Rev. Wright is the least of Obama's problems.
Back to top
Big Ben
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 4747


PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The combination of a lot of things are all parts of the mosaic that reveal O'Bumma to be a radical or at the very least a radical sympathizer: reverend wright, contempt for working people who cling to religion, unrepentent terrorist william ayers, michelle o'bumma the beneficiary of affirmative action and recipient of a good life believing America is a mean country.

Now suddenly O'Bumma tries to pretend wright is suddenly a different man because of what happened Monday. wright has been that way and has espoused hatred for America, whites, etc. for a long, long time. And during that time, O'Bumma was attached to him at the hip. Nothing changed except that more people heard it.
Back to top
ZiaAries
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 14110
Location: United States of America

PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Big Ben wrote:
The combination of a lot of things are all parts of the mosaic that reveal O'Bumma to be a radical or at the very least a radical sympathizer: reverend wright, contempt for working people who cling to religion, unrepentent terrorist william ayers, michelle o'bumma the beneficiary of affirmative action and recipient of a good life believing America is a mean country.

Now suddenly O'Bumma tries to pretend wright is suddenly a different man because of what happened Monday. wright has been that way and has espoused hatred for America, whites, etc. for a long, long time. And during that time, O'Bumma was attached to him at the hip. Nothing changed except that more people heard it.


Could you repeat that? Shocked
Back to top
Cambridge
FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)


Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 1619


PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 1:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Big Ben wrote:
The combination of a lot of things are all parts of the mosaic that reveal O'Bumma to be a radical or at the very least a radical sympathizer: reverend wright, contempt for working people who cling to religion, unrepentent terrorist william ayers, michelle o'bumma the beneficiary of affirmative action and recipient of a good life believing America is a mean country.

Now suddenly O'Bumma tries to pretend wright is suddenly a different man because of what happened Monday. wright has been that way and has espoused hatred for America, whites, etc. for a long, long time. And during that time, O'Bumma was attached to him at the hip. Nothing changed except that more people heard it.


Doesn't need repeating for my book, zia. The Democrats will lose in 2008, despite having all the sympathies of the public in 2006. Did you see today's headlines? The Democratic Congress is actually considering another funding bill for the Muslim American war. The Democrats don't deserve the American public's support, and they won't get it.

The only chance they have is if they go to convention with Billary and Obumma so deadlocked that the delegates turn to the truly experienced candidate, Al Gore. Edwards would be a good second choice. But these two clowns (Billary and Obumma) are an embarrassment. Democrats! Give em an opportunity to F*** up a wet dream, and they will.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Female First Forum Forum Index -> Politics And Social Issues All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
terms and conditions Latest Posts


---