Whether you like men in
pantyhose or not, it is interesting that women who get turned on by it are leading those that do not. Boy I wished I could have found a woman that got turned on by it because I enjoy wearing
hose at times because of how it feels upon the skin.
It is also interesting that men NOT wearing
pantyhose is not that old of an idea..18th century to today. In the 12th century Europe, Breeches worn by men became close fitting, reaching from the waist to the foot like modern
tights. Women wore
stockings held up at the knee by garters. Then in 1545, knitted
stockings came into fashion. In 1589, when the first knitting machine was invented, silk and cotton became the popular fibers of the era and silk became the choice of royalty. Silk
stockings were worn at times in layers when it was cold. In 17th Century, when large boots were in fashion, linen "boot
hose" were worn to protect the silk
stockings underneath. Men continued to wear silk
stockings WITH GARTERS until the end of the 18th century when long trousers began to appear and then socks have been worn underneath ever since except in the case of those men who enjoy wearing
pantyhose underneath instead.
So, it wasn't until the 18th century that
stockings started to become an "exclusive" piece of wardrobe per se for women and made primarily for women. Now, there are companies that are catering to men who enjoy wearing
hose as noted in the postings.
As I stated earlier, I do enjoy wearing them at times because of how they feel, but I enjoy it even more seeing women in
hose and heels and how it feels when I caress their
hose covered legs !!!
But everyone has their preferences and whether it is a perversion as some say it is in these postings is a matter of ones on preferences and beliefs. So is it perverted for men to wear
hose? It wasn't from the 1500's to the 1800's. As noted above, men even wore garters to hold them up. At one time, it was "wrong" for women to wear pants but now, they do. Does that mean it was a perversion for women to wear pants when it was "wrong"? No, it just wasn't an accepted fashion then.
Men even wore skirts in ancient Rome and Greece and even today in Scotland...Oh I forgot, they aren't skirts in Scotland, they're kilts. Even so, today if a man is caught wearing a skirt, except for maybe a kilt, he will be considered wierd or even a pervert by many. But yet, that is due to societal changes and acceptabilities more so than anything else. Skirts have become primarily the clothing of women and because of it, it can no longer be for men even though pants which were consider to be primarily for men and "wrong" for women to wear at one time are now fashionable for women to wear.
Common fashions may come and go but they really don't become perverted per se except in the minds of those who choose to be very judgemental of others and just because it is wrong for one person or group of people does not necessarily make it wrong for others or even perverted. So, if a man wants to wear
hose, I say let him. If he wants to wear a skirt, go ahead. I just think women look better in
hose and in skirts than any man and I would prefer to see women in them than a man. But then again, that is my preference!!
There's my soap box...Red