When a robber can sue the person, who's house he was robbing, because he got injured whilst doing so, our human right have gone to Sh*T.
Kalel wrote:As long as society puts the selfish needs of the one before all of society...
It will not get better.
Just take this forum for instance... it's all about the selfish needs of the individual!
None dare talk about what's right or wrong in fear of offending others feelings!
Kalel wrote:Take, for instance, this post...
http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=130190
Here we have N A M B L A (a pedahile group) within the gay's and not one person has had a remark about it!
Is that because the homosexuals really want access to the kids?
And how come heterosexual parents here are not outraged that their fellow homosexual FF members are not outraged by being associated with that pedaphile group?
And the latter, is a classic example where no one here wants to offend others!
Screw the fact that children pay the price!
That's what happens when you remove morals and put the needs of one before the needs of society (children get molested because no one say's it's wrong)!
You have "observers" instead of people of character that speak up about what is wrong!
Kalel wrote:The needs of the many (especialy the children) do outweigh the needs of the few!
That's what everyone forgets here... they think there are no children or that since it never killed the child... it's acceptable!
So personal freedom has to have a limit!
Strong morals protects everyone with a fair and even hand!
Sure..it screws the selfish... but then... what has the selfish done for his fellow man?
Kalel wrote:Can you go any deeper than my last sentence?
Kalel wrote:Take, for instance, this post...
http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=130190
Here we have N A M B L A (a pedahile group) within the gay's and not one person has had a remark about it!
Is that because the homosexuals really want access to the kids?
And how come heterosexual parents here are not outraged that their fellow homosexual FF members are not outraged by being associated with that pedaphile group?
And the latter, is a classic example where no one here wants to offend others!
Screw the fact that children pay the price!
That's what happens when you remove morals and put the needs of one before the needs of society (children get molested because no one say's it's wrong)!
You have "observers" instead of people of character that speak up about what is wrong!
JollyGiant wrote:The concept of Human Rights is a good thing, it should provide a moral framework which we all aspire to. The problem lies with the current Human Rights legislation and how it applies in practice. It's too vague, and open to interpretation.
In my opinion there should be no Human Rights legislation because it's too difficult to define (try thinking of every conceivable way a person could be slighted), and concerns an individuals state of mind based on their own experiences and prejudices. The concept should remain, but instead of promoting victimization, it should promote individual responsibility.
(If anyone is sad enough to want me to explain the difference between human rights and civil libs, I will!)
Judges are construing it way to broad
Does anyone feel happeir since the Human Rights Act? People feel angry, not more protected.
Return to Politics And Social Issues
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests