|
|
| Author |
Message |
Loki

Joined: 12 Apr 2005 Posts: 5347 Location: Dorset, UK
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 7:19 pm Post subject: Firefox |
|
|
Everytime I've downloaded "Critical Updates", it will tell me I have more "Critical Updates" a couple of weeks later!
Do Firefox release "Critical Updates" that often? Or is my Firefox screwed?!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
curlypaul FemaleFirst Regular (50+ Posts)

Joined: 30 Aug 2005 Posts: 53
|
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 11:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| yes they do seem to release them all the while, but I have never noticed any difference between them yet! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tina TV FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)

Joined: 10 Jan 2005 Posts: 1037 Location: Hampshire, UK
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 7:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
I use the the linux version and compile from source so my experience may be
different. I see security alerts for Firefox perhaps once every two months,
they may be more frequent under Windows as the underlying OS is less
stable or secure.
Typically a warning of a possible attack will come out one day (Friday) and
a patch will be available a couple of days later (Sunday). Users of binary
distributions may have to wait a few more days for the binary patch to
be made available, in this example I think my wife saw a Fedora update on
the Wednesday.
Beats the pants off M$s 6-8 week update times. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Loki

Joined: 12 Apr 2005 Posts: 5347 Location: Dorset, UK
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you for the replies.
I think I might leave the updates for a while! I've got 3 anti-spy ware and an anti-virus programme running at the same time, it should be fairy well protected!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Susan J FemaleFirst Chatter (200+ Posts)

Joined: 09 Jun 2005 Posts: 226 Location: Liverpool UK
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 10:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Like Tina, I use the Linux version, recompiled by me.
I have a hardware firewall and not using windows helps with virus proofing even though I do have antivirus for Linux which has never found anything.
I like Firefox as I've mentioned in other fora - enjoy
Susan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blobrana FemaleFirst Chatter (200+ Posts)

Joined: 21 May 2005 Posts: 262 Location: Planet Earth, but moving soon
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 11:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For firefox sake!
Well there is a nasty unpatched vulnerability that can be solved by typing out a few words into the browser console.
See at the bottom of the page here:
http://www.geocities.com/amigarana/firefox.htm
(rather than test the beta version 1.5)
There are a few speed up tips on the page as well |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
boingo FemaleFirst Guru

Joined: 19 Feb 2006 Posts: 15910 Location: Perth, Western Australia (GMT+8hrs)
|
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 4:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've been using Firfox, and it's previous ancestors, for a few years now. I can't remember it ever telling me there was a critical update. I used to have it set to load up at the firefox webpage, and sometimes I'd get a message on the screen telling me there was a new version available, but that'd be all.
Perhaps I set it up to do automatic updates. I don't remember.
One little niggling thing with firefox though: I always check the box for it to automatically close the download window once all downloads are complete. It doesn't do it though!!! -With either the latest version of Firefox, or the last version.
Oh, well. It's free, so I shouldn't complain.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
monosodium FemaleFirst Guru

Joined: 21 Oct 2005 Posts: 5734 Location: In UR base snifin all UR pantys
|
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Tina TV wrote: |
| ...they may be more frequent under Windows as the underlying OS is less stable or secure. |
What an absolute load of rubbish. This is one of those things people who don't like MS say because they feel they don't need to justify it, and people who don't know what they're talking about agree with because they feel like they have some kind of gripe even though their machine hasn't crashed in yonks.
Saying Windows is insecure is like saying apple OSX is secure. It's only secure because nobody has decided it's worth attacking for a while.
You also have to factor in that Windows XP for example is going to have many times the number of researchers, ne'er do wells and other users than any of the other OS's and if you multiply out the fgure of issues found per 1000 users from an independent body like CERT then the numbers don't add up.
You're also comparing features from a browser that is almost 4 years old with one that is essentially new. You'd have hoped in that time they'd have learned a few things, the internet has moved on.
Linux always reminds me of Wikipedia in that for every one person who actually knows what they are talking about there are 10 who don't who shout about it and get their way and for each of those there are 1,000 more who follow and blindly accept it as being great without having a clue as to why. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
frankiegalleywood You Go Girl (100+ Posts)

Joined: 23 Feb 2006 Posts: 195 Location: essex (for my sins)
|
Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 3:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
all i can say is i have had less problems with Firefox than with Internet Explorer.
and i've never been asked to update Firefox either. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
newuser FemaleFirst Newbie (20+ posts)
Joined: 16 Jun 2006 Posts: 31
|
Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 11:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| monosodium wrote: |
| Tina TV wrote: |
| ...they may be more frequent under Windows as the underlying OS is less stable or secure. |
What an absolute load of rubbish. This is one of those things people who don't like MS say because they feel they don't need to justify it, and people who don't know what they're talking about agree with because they feel like they have some kind of gripe even though their machine hasn't crashed in yonks.
Saying Windows is insecure is like saying apple OSX is secure. It's only secure because nobody has decided it's worth attacking for a while.
You also have to factor in that Windows XP for example is going to have many times the number of researchers, ne'er do wells and other users than any of the other OS's and if you multiply out the fgure of issues found per 1000 users from an independent body like CERT then the numbers don't add up.
You're also comparing features from a browser that is almost 4 years old with one that is essentially new. You'd have hoped in that time they'd have learned a few things, the internet has moved on.
Linux always reminds me of Wikipedia in that for every one person who actually knows what they are talking about there are 10 who don't who shout about it and get their way and for each of those there are 1,000 more who follow and blindly accept it as being great without having a clue as to why. |
triffic |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cosmicB FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)
Joined: 31 Jan 2005 Posts: 2616
|
Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 12:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Get SeaMonkey instead of Firefox... Same people, much better browser... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IR1337

Joined: 11 Oct 2005 Posts: 9815 Location: Fort Apache
|
Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 8:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cosmicB wrote: |
| Get SeaMonkey instead of Firefox... Same people, much better browser... |
I've never heard of it, before. Do you have it?
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stavpal FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)
Joined: 06 May 2006 Posts: 1512 Location: ..right behind you
|
Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 9:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
"Seamonkey" is new name of Mozilla browser (after the mozilla 1.7 version, seamonkey came)
"The SeaMonkey project is a community effort to deliver production-quality releases of code derived from the application formerly known as "Mozilla Application Suite". Whereas the main focus of the Mozilla Foundation is on Mozilla Firefox and Mozilla Thunderbird, our group of dedicated volunteers works to ensure that you can have "everything but the kitchen sink" — and have it stable enough for corporate use." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cosmicB FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)
Joined: 31 Jan 2005 Posts: 2616
|
Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 4:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
And to add to that... SeaMonkey is what will be driving the Communication Age of mankind, far into the future...
The genius and dedication pouring out from the SeaMonkey Community Project is setting precidents in the software industry... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bipedal Male FemaleFirst Regular (50+ Posts)

Joined: 20 Jul 2006 Posts: 78 Location: UK
|
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Firefox under windoze is great...
except...
FOR THE 100% CPU usage glitch that seems to afflict it, not such a problem on my Dual CPU home PC, but a nightmare at work, when I am supposed to be <ahem> working!!!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|