Celebrity News...
  1. NKOTB: No new fans
  2. Tilda Swinton no actress
  3. Seth Rogen's Amber punch
  4. Hugh Hefner's prude girlfriend
Entertainment...
  1. Shannen Doherty: 'Tori Spelling's A Liar'.
  2. Guy Ritchie: 'i'm Not Renewing Wedding Vows With Madonna'.
  3. Sienna Miller Pretends She Isn't Famous.
  4. Keira Knightley Never Considered Diana Movie Link.
Latest Music...
  1. Ironik’s New Single Stay With Me
  2. The Best Of Creedence Clearwater Revival
  3. Black Kids New Album Partie Traumatic
  4. Paul Heaton New Album The Cross Eyed Rambler
Movie Reviews...
  1. Katyn
  2. Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired
  3. The Heckler
  4. Cinema's Action Women


Female First Forum Forum Index
Firefox
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next  
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Female First Forum Forum Index -> Computer Problem Solver
Author Message
Loki



Joined: 12 Apr 2005
Posts: 5347
Location: Dorset, UK

PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 7:19 pm    Post subject: Firefox Reply with quote

Everytime I've downloaded "Critical Updates", it will tell me I have more "Critical Updates" a couple of weeks later!
Do Firefox release "Critical Updates" that often? Or is my Firefox screwed?! Confused Sad
Back to top
curlypaul
FemaleFirst Regular (50+ Posts)


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 53


PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 11:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yes they do seem to release them all the while, but I have never noticed any difference between them yet!
Back to top
Tina TV
FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)


Joined: 10 Jan 2005
Posts: 1037
Location: Hampshire, UK

PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 7:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I use the the linux version and compile from source so my experience may be
different. I see security alerts for Firefox perhaps once every two months,
they may be more frequent under Windows as the underlying OS is less
stable or secure.

Typically a warning of a possible attack will come out one day (Friday) and
a patch will be available a couple of days later (Sunday). Users of binary
distributions may have to wait a few more days for the binary patch to
be made available, in this example I think my wife saw a Fedora update on
the Wednesday.

Beats the pants off M$s 6-8 week update times.
Back to top
Loki



Joined: 12 Apr 2005
Posts: 5347
Location: Dorset, UK

PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 5:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you for the replies.

I think I might leave the updates for a while! I've got 3 anti-spy ware and an anti-virus programme running at the same time, it should be fairy well protected! Razz
Back to top
Susan J
FemaleFirst Chatter (200+ Posts)


Joined: 09 Jun 2005
Posts: 226
Location: Liverpool UK

PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 10:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Like Tina, I use the Linux version, recompiled by me.

I have a hardware firewall and not using windows helps with virus proofing even though I do have antivirus for Linux which has never found anything.

I like Firefox as I've mentioned in other fora - enjoy

Susan
Back to top
blobrana
FemaleFirst Chatter (200+ Posts)


Joined: 21 May 2005
Posts: 262
Location: Planet Earth, but moving soon

PostPosted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 11:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For firefox sake!
Well there is a nasty unpatched vulnerability that can be solved by typing out a few words into the browser console.

See at the bottom of the page here:
http://www.geocities.com/amigarana/firefox.htm

(rather than test the beta version 1.5)

There are a few speed up tips on the page as well
Back to top
boingo
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 19 Feb 2006
Posts: 15910
Location: Perth, Western Australia (GMT+8hrs)

PostPosted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 4:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've been using Firfox, and it's previous ancestors, for a few years now. I can't remember it ever telling me there was a critical update. I used to have it set to load up at the firefox webpage, and sometimes I'd get a message on the screen telling me there was a new version available, but that'd be all.
Perhaps I set it up to do automatic updates. I don't remember.

One little niggling thing with firefox though: I always check the box for it to automatically close the download window once all downloads are complete. It doesn't do it though!!! -With either the latest version of Firefox, or the last version.
Oh, well. It's free, so I shouldn't complain. Smile
Back to top
monosodium
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 21 Oct 2005
Posts: 5734
Location: In UR base snifin all UR pantys

PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 7:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tina TV wrote:
...they may be more frequent under Windows as the underlying OS is less stable or secure.

What an absolute load of rubbish. This is one of those things people who don't like MS say because they feel they don't need to justify it, and people who don't know what they're talking about agree with because they feel like they have some kind of gripe even though their machine hasn't crashed in yonks.

Saying Windows is insecure is like saying apple OSX is secure. It's only secure because nobody has decided it's worth attacking for a while.

You also have to factor in that Windows XP for example is going to have many times the number of researchers, ne'er do wells and other users than any of the other OS's and if you multiply out the fgure of issues found per 1000 users from an independent body like CERT then the numbers don't add up.

You're also comparing features from a browser that is almost 4 years old with one that is essentially new. You'd have hoped in that time they'd have learned a few things, the internet has moved on.

Linux always reminds me of Wikipedia in that for every one person who actually knows what they are talking about there are 10 who don't who shout about it and get their way and for each of those there are 1,000 more who follow and blindly accept it as being great without having a clue as to why.
Back to top
frankiegalleywood
You Go Girl (100+ Posts)


Joined: 23 Feb 2006
Posts: 195
Location: essex (for my sins)

PostPosted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 3:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

all i can say is i have had less problems with Firefox than with Internet Explorer.
and i've never been asked to update Firefox either.
Back to top
newuser
FemaleFirst Newbie (20+ posts)


Joined: 16 Jun 2006
Posts: 31


PostPosted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 11:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

monosodium wrote:
Tina TV wrote:
...they may be more frequent under Windows as the underlying OS is less stable or secure.

What an absolute load of rubbish. This is one of those things people who don't like MS say because they feel they don't need to justify it, and people who don't know what they're talking about agree with because they feel like they have some kind of gripe even though their machine hasn't crashed in yonks.

Saying Windows is insecure is like saying apple OSX is secure. It's only secure because nobody has decided it's worth attacking for a while.

You also have to factor in that Windows XP for example is going to have many times the number of researchers, ne'er do wells and other users than any of the other OS's and if you multiply out the fgure of issues found per 1000 users from an independent body like CERT then the numbers don't add up.

You're also comparing features from a browser that is almost 4 years old with one that is essentially new. You'd have hoped in that time they'd have learned a few things, the internet has moved on.

Linux always reminds me of Wikipedia in that for every one person who actually knows what they are talking about there are 10 who don't who shout about it and get their way and for each of those there are 1,000 more who follow and blindly accept it as being great without having a clue as to why.


Clap triffic
Back to top
cosmicB
FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)


Joined: 31 Jan 2005
Posts: 2616


PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 12:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Get SeaMonkey instead of Firefox... Same people, much better browser...
Back to top
IR1337



Joined: 11 Oct 2005
Posts: 9815
Location: Fort Apache

PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 8:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

cosmicB wrote:
Get SeaMonkey instead of Firefox... Same people, much better browser...



I've never heard of it, before. Do you have it?

http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
Back to top
stavpal
FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)


Joined: 06 May 2006
Posts: 1512
Location: ..right behind you

PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 9:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

"Seamonkey" is new name of Mozilla browser (after the mozilla 1.7 version, seamonkey came)

"The SeaMonkey project is a community effort to deliver production-quality releases of code derived from the application formerly known as "Mozilla Application Suite". Whereas the main focus of the Mozilla Foundation is on Mozilla Firefox and Mozilla Thunderbird, our group of dedicated volunteers works to ensure that you can have "everything but the kitchen sink" — and have it stable enough for corporate use."
Back to top
cosmicB
FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)


Joined: 31 Jan 2005
Posts: 2616


PostPosted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 4:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And to add to that... SeaMonkey is what will be driving the Communication Age of mankind, far into the future...

The genius and dedication pouring out from the SeaMonkey Community Project is setting precidents in the software industry...
Back to top
Bipedal Male
FemaleFirst Regular (50+ Posts)


Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Posts: 78
Location: UK

PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Firefox under windoze is great...

except...

FOR THE 100% CPU usage glitch that seems to afflict it, not such a problem on my Dual CPU home PC, but a nightmare at work, when I am supposed to be <ahem> working!!! Wink
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Female First Forum Forum Index -> Computer Problem Solver All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
terms and conditions Latest Posts