I have looked-over your last several pages of postings and I have not found any justification, or rationale, for your attack on those who choose to wear and/or use nappies.
All I have seen is childish name-calling, and pathetic attacks on others. I have seen no rationale for your views, whatsoever. It would seem that you have a singular dislike for people who choose to indulge in "nappy" pastimes. Okay, fair-enough, that is your prerogative. However, I have to wonder as to why you choose to be so vehemently prejudiced against such pastimes?
Joined: 20 Aug 2007 Posts: 6837 Location: Hampshire/Yorkshire
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 12:35 pm Post subject:
. wrote:
The Colonel wrote:
But it's not. It is a psychological disorder on the DSM.
Twaddle! What are you going-on about: "But it's not.", you say. Not what? You make no sense whatsoever (as always!). Please, can you, at least, have the decency to reply in full sentences, and state that which you mean, instead of assuming that we are all psychic.
You are quite correct in your assertion that "it" is a listed psychological disorder within DSM., (Presumably, by "it", you mean a nappy-fetish?).
So what? Why does such a listing mean that "it" is anyway harmful to anyone? Why should a DSM listing deprive people of their human rights, which includes the right to wear and use nappies, should they so wish? I would suggest that it does not do so, in any way, shape or form.
I would also suggest that your stated theories on "Munchausen by Proxy" are seriously flawed in this connection. There may be parents who force their children into nappies, for their own gain, and, IMHO, this is abhorrent, although others might disagree, of course. But you must also realise that there are some children who enjoy wearing and using nappies, for whatever reason. That is the very nature of variety within the human sphere of diversity.
I know that you are a growing person, as are we all, but you have much to learn. The more that you learn, the more you will realise how much you do not know, or understand. This is part of the "growing-up" process.
I only ever challenged those with MSbP. I simply find the rest amusing. That is on record.
As a 50 year old retired Lieutenant Colonel, I don't have any growing up left to do. I have already done that over many, many years.
I only ever challenged those with MSbP. I simply find the rest amusing. That is on record.
As a 50 year old retired Lieutenant Colonel, I don't have any growing up left to do. I have already done that over many, many years.
Okay, thank you for that. At least you have been honest about the fact that you are merely "amused". If that is the case, can I ask why are you so volatile and dismissive of other's delictations. These are real people with real feelings? What purpose does your condemnation serve? Please explain.
I would propose that your statement that you have no "growing-up" to do, is naive, at the very least. I am many years older than you, and I think, and hope, that I still have much "growing-up" to do.... I believe, that the learning process is with us all, until we expire. I never thought, for one moment, that I knew "everything" at the age of Fifty, I would not have been so arrogant. Maybe you do know everything? Maybe I'm wrong?
Joined: 20 Aug 2007 Posts: 6837 Location: Hampshire/Yorkshire
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 2:30 pm Post subject:
. wrote:
The Colonel wrote:
I only ever challenged those with MSbP. I simply find the rest amusing. That is on record.
As a 50 year old retired Lieutenant Colonel, I don't have any growing up left to do. I have already done that over many, many years.
Okay, thank you for that. At least you have been honest about the fact that you are merely "amused". If that is the case, can I ask why are you so volatile and dismissive of other's delictations. These are real people with real feelings? What purpose does your condemnation serve? Please explain.
I would propose that your statement that you have no "growing-up" to do, is naive, at the very least. I am many years older than you, and I think, and hope, that I still have much "growing-up" to do.... I believe, that the learning process is with us all, until we expire. I never thought, for one moment, that I knew "everything" at the age of Fifty, I would not have been so arrogant. Maybe you do know everything? Maybe I'm wrong?
I find it very sad that this is how you feel. So you think that you have nothing else to learn? You think that you have come to a point in your life where you know "more than enough"?
Get a grip, you still have much to learn, and much growing-up still to do, as have we all. Life is not over at 50yo. Believe me!
Joined: 20 Aug 2007 Posts: 6837 Location: Hampshire/Yorkshire
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 8:09 pm Post subject:
. wrote:
The Colonel wrote:
I know more than enough.
I find it very sad that this is how you feel. So you think that you have nothing else to learn? You think that you have come to a point in your life where you know "more than enough"?
Get a grip, you still have much to learn, and much growing-up still to do, as have we all. Life is not over at 50yo. Believe me!
It is pretty much for someone with a degenerative medical condition.
I find it very sad that this is how you feel. So you think that you have nothing else to learn? You think that you have come to a point in your life where you know "more than enough"?
Get a grip, you still have much to learn, and much growing-up still to do, as have we all. Life is not over at 50yo. Believe me!
It is pretty much for someone with a degenerative medical condition.
Believe me.
Life's over at 50 for someone with a degenerative medical condition? Unless you have such a condition, Colonel, then that's beside the point surely.
Joined: 20 Aug 2007 Posts: 6837 Location: Hampshire/Yorkshire
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 2:19 pm Post subject:
Death From Above 1993 wrote:
The Colonel wrote:
. wrote:
The Colonel wrote:
I know more than enough.
I find it very sad that this is how you feel. So you think that you have nothing else to learn? You think that you have come to a point in your life where you know "more than enough"?
Get a grip, you still have much to learn, and much growing-up still to do, as have we all. Life is not over at 50yo. Believe me!
It is pretty much for someone with a degenerative medical condition.
Believe me.
Life's over at 50 for someone with a degenerative medical condition? Unless you have such a condition, Colonel, then that's beside the point surely.
I find it very sad that this is how you feel. So you think that you have nothing else to learn? You think that you have come to a point in your life where you know "more than enough"?
Get a grip, you still have much to learn, and much growing-up still to do, as have we all. Life is not over at 50yo. Believe me!
It is pretty much for someone with a degenerative medical condition.
Believe me.
Life's over at 50 for someone with a degenerative medical condition? Unless you have such a condition, Colonel, then that's beside the point surely.
I am speaking factually.
Well, in that case, you are just using random facts to try and support your poor argument, which is no help to anyone. I mean, you say you're 50 - You could have 40 years or more left to live, do you really think you will learn nothing in that time?
Joined: 20 Aug 2007 Posts: 6837 Location: Hampshire/Yorkshire
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 6:40 pm Post subject:
Death From Above 1993 wrote:
The Colonel wrote:
Death From Above 1993 wrote:
The Colonel wrote:
. wrote:
The Colonel wrote:
I know more than enough.
I find it very sad that this is how you feel. So you think that you have nothing else to learn? You think that you have come to a point in your life where you know "more than enough"?
Get a grip, you still have much to learn, and much growing-up still to do, as have we all. Life is not over at 50yo. Believe me!
It is pretty much for someone with a degenerative medical condition.
Believe me.
Life's over at 50 for someone with a degenerative medical condition? Unless you have such a condition, Colonel, then that's beside the point surely.
I am speaking factually.
Well, in that case, you are just using random facts to try and support your poor argument, which is no help to anyone. I mean, you say you're 50 - You could have 40 years or more left to live, do you really think you will learn nothing in that time?
Random? Not random.
I will not be here in 40 years time. I doubt even 15.
I find it very sad that this is how you feel. So you think that you have nothing else to learn? You think that you have come to a point in your life where you know "more than enough"?
Get a grip, you still have much to learn, and much growing-up still to do, as have we all. Life is not over at 50yo. Believe me!
It is pretty much for someone with a degenerative medical condition.
Believe me.
Life's over at 50 for someone with a degenerative medical condition? Unless you have such a condition, Colonel, then that's beside the point surely.
I am speaking factually.
Well, in that case, you are just using random facts to try and support your poor argument, which is no help to anyone. I mean, you say you're 50 - You could have 40 years or more left to live, do you really think you will learn nothing in that time?
Random? Not random.
I will not be here in 40 years time. I doubt even 15.
Joined: 20 Aug 2007 Posts: 6837 Location: Hampshire/Yorkshire
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 5:04 pm Post subject:
Death From Above 1993 wrote:
The Colonel wrote:
Death From Above 1993 wrote:
The Colonel wrote:
Death From Above 1993 wrote:
The Colonel wrote:
. wrote:
The Colonel wrote:
I know more than enough.
I find it very sad that this is how you feel. So you think that you have nothing else to learn? You think that you have come to a point in your life where you know "more than enough"?
Get a grip, you still have much to learn, and much growing-up still to do, as have we all. Life is not over at 50yo. Believe me!
It is pretty much for someone with a degenerative medical condition.
Believe me.
Life's over at 50 for someone with a degenerative medical condition? Unless you have such a condition, Colonel, then that's beside the point surely.
I am speaking factually.
Well, in that case, you are just using random facts to try and support your poor argument, which is no help to anyone. I mean, you say you're 50 - You could have 40 years or more left to live, do you really think you will learn nothing in that time?
Random? Not random.
I will not be here in 40 years time. I doubt even 15.
Doesn't sound good - Are you ill or something?
I'm not going to say on a forum like this. The good thing is - not many visit this section or this thread!
Site Map
FAQ
Usergroups
Search
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Register
My Profile Space
