|
|
| Author |
Message |
Starshine FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)

Joined: 15 Feb 2008 Posts: 1510 Location: UK
|
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 7:17 pm Post subject: Fashion Police - What would you ban? |
|
|
Imagine you are made Chief Superintendent of the Fashion Police for one day. You can ban one thing fashion-wise. What would you ban?
I am Chief Superintendent Starshine I am going to ban skirts worn with trousers!
I now resign as Superintendent. Next Superintendent please! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tobinfest FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)
Joined: 21 Feb 2008 Posts: 1156 Location: USA
|
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Superintendent Tobinfest at your service.
Fashion police, I would ban boys wearing their pants around their thighs and letting their boxer shorts show. Too much information!!!!
Females who do the same would get a written warning and after they accumulate 50-100 of these, then we will CRACK down.
This might be a little sexist, but I don't care. After all I am the Superintendent. Now resigning. Next? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sharon den Adel FemaleFirst Guru

Joined: 02 Mar 2008 Posts: 6426 Location: In Sharon's Heart
|
Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 7:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would ban people from wearing too tight tops that makes their tummys squish over their jeans. We call them 'muffins' over here.
Next! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ruth5 FemaleFirst Guru

Joined: 14 Dec 2006 Posts: 8074 Location: West Country
|
Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Girls who wear tights with trainers.
Guys whos jeans hang around to far below their bums. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jinjin FemaleFirst Guru

Joined: 11 Oct 2006 Posts: 85223
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 3:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I would ban all cover-up that is not painted on the body. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tobinfest FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)
Joined: 21 Feb 2008 Posts: 1156 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 12:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Superintendant Tobinfest, back on duty.
This will probably irritate some, (sorry) but I would ban those mulitple piercings along both eyebrows and the six or so in each ear. Many are into them. I really do not like them. Banned!
Next? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
boingo FemaleFirst Guru

Joined: 19 Feb 2006 Posts: 17314 Location: Perth, Western Australia (GMT+8hrs)
|
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 7:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
No sports shoes without socks.
No socks with sandals.
No sandals for men.
No flip flops.
None deck shoes (boat shoes) -They're the fuggliest footwear ever invented. Ugly!
No Crocs shoes photo
No vests or other ugly thermal underwear. bad taste!
No Y-fronts
Pretty much 90% of the clothing available for men in Western Australian stores should also be banned because it's fuggly! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tobinfest FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)
Joined: 21 Feb 2008 Posts: 1156 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
mesh pantyhose or stockings, unless only for sex.
To trampy for business use.
Sorry. My two cents. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joyofsox FemaleFirst Guru

Joined: 06 Mar 2007 Posts: 8055 Location: Mongville-on-Edge.
|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Shorts and leggings, although shorts and tights is a combination nearly as bad. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tobinfest FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)
Joined: 21 Feb 2008 Posts: 1156 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| baseball hats, worn to the side or backwards. The visor is intended to keep the sun out of your eyes, not your ears or your neck! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
honbuns FemaleFirst Senior Member (500+ Posts)

Joined: 10 Apr 2008 Posts: 802
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 9:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Piercings other ears and especially those tunnel peircings.
Tatoos.
Jeans that are in shreds or look like they have used when decorating the house and the wearing a skirt over trousers thing just looks daft. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tobinfest FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)
Joined: 21 Feb 2008 Posts: 1156 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 3:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Agree with honbuns about tatoos, which will rile some on this site.
I know that it is a staement, but to me, the statement says "I guess I don't want to work for you".
I dealt with a young (25 years old) girl, wanting to rent a rental house. Short skirt (hot!), buxomy (hot!) and then tatoos up both sides of her neck and under her chin. (Ugh!) My wife was impressed (not!).
She needs financial assistance, which we cannot do for her, but, at the same time, she had the money, (not cheap) to get all these tatoos. This is my bias and perhaps you all disagree. Get the butterfly on your butt, if you must, but at least it is covered.
My two cents, take it or leave it, please. If you want body art, so be it, but it might affect your ability to get or maintain employment, self inflicted. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|