Celebrity News...
  1. Jennifer Aniston's single joy
  2. 'Raver' Dita Von Teese
  3. Katie Price's designer children
  4. Kaiser Chiefs' naked no
Entertainment...
  1. Dennis Quaid's Southern Roots Inspire Movie Role.
  2. Clint Eastwood: 'Jolie's Hampered By Her Looks'.
  3. Kirsten Dunst Has Turned Her Life Around After Rehab Stint.
  4. Eminem Named 'Best Rapper Alive'.
Latest Music...
  1. Ironik’s New Single Stay With Me
  2. The Best Of Creedence Clearwater Revival
  3. Black Kids New Album Partie Traumatic
  4. Paul Heaton New Album The Cross Eyed Rambler
Movie Reviews...
  1. Katyn
  2. Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired
  3. The Heckler
  4. Cinema's Action Women


Female First Forum Forum Index
Fashion Police - What would you ban?
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Female First Forum Forum Index -> Stupid Zone
Author Message
Starshine
FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)


Joined: 15 Feb 2008
Posts: 1510
Location: UK

PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 7:17 pm    Post subject: Fashion Police - What would you ban? Reply with quote

Imagine you are made Chief Superintendent of the Fashion Police for one day. You can ban one thing fashion-wise. What would you ban?

I am Chief Superintendent Starshine I am going to ban skirts worn with trousers!

I now resign as Superintendent. Next Superintendent please!
Back to top
tobinfest
FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)


Joined: 21 Feb 2008
Posts: 1156
Location: USA

PostPosted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 5:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Superintendent Tobinfest at your service.

Fashion police, I would ban boys wearing their pants around their thighs and letting their boxer shorts show. Too much information!!!!

Females who do the same would get a written warning and after they accumulate 50-100 of these, then we will CRACK down. Laughing

This might be a little sexist, but I don't care. After all I am the Superintendent. Now resigning. Next?
Back to top
Sharon den Adel
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 02 Mar 2008
Posts: 6426
Location: In Sharon's Heart

PostPosted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 7:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would ban people from wearing too tight tops that makes their tummys squish over their jeans. We call them 'muffins' over here. Wink

Next!
Back to top
Ruth5
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 14 Dec 2006
Posts: 8074
Location: West Country

PostPosted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Girls who wear tights with trainers.
Guys whos jeans hang around to far below their bums.
Back to top
jinjin
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 11 Oct 2006
Posts: 85223


PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 3:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would ban all cover-up that is not painted on the body.
Back to top
tobinfest
FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)


Joined: 21 Feb 2008
Posts: 1156
Location: USA

PostPosted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 12:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Superintendant Tobinfest, back on duty.

This will probably irritate some, (sorry) but I would ban those mulitple piercings along both eyebrows and the six or so in each ear. Many are into them. I really do not like them. Banned!

Next?
Back to top
boingo
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 19 Feb 2006
Posts: 17314
Location: Perth, Western Australia (GMT+8hrs)

PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 7:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

No sports shoes without socks.
No socks with sandals.
No sandals for men.
No flip flops.
None deck shoes (boat shoes) -They're the fuggliest footwear ever invented. Ugly!
No Crocs shoes photo
No vests or other ugly thermal underwear. bad taste!
No Y-fronts
Pretty much 90% of the clothing available for men in Western Australian stores should also be banned because it's fuggly!
Back to top
tobinfest
FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)


Joined: 21 Feb 2008
Posts: 1156
Location: USA

PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mesh pantyhose or stockings, unless only for sex.
To trampy for business use.
Sorry. My two cents.
Back to top
Joyofsox
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 8055
Location: Mongville-on-Edge.

PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shorts and leggings, although shorts and tights is a combination nearly as bad.
Back to top
tobinfest
FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)


Joined: 21 Feb 2008
Posts: 1156
Location: USA

PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

baseball hats, worn to the side or backwards. The visor is intended to keep the sun out of your eyes, not your ears or your neck!
Back to top
honbuns
FemaleFirst Senior Member (500+ Posts)


Joined: 10 Apr 2008
Posts: 802


PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 9:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Piercings other ears and especially those tunnel peircings.

Tatoos.

Jeans that are in shreds or look like they have used when decorating the house and the wearing a skirt over trousers thing just looks daft.
Back to top
tobinfest
FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)


Joined: 21 Feb 2008
Posts: 1156
Location: USA

PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 3:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Agree with honbuns about tatoos, which will rile some on this site.
I know that it is a staement, but to me, the statement says "I guess I don't want to work for you".
I dealt with a young (25 years old) girl, wanting to rent a rental house. Short skirt (hot!), buxomy (hot!) and then tatoos up both sides of her neck and under her chin. (Ugh!) My wife was impressed (not!).
She needs financial assistance, which we cannot do for her, but, at the same time, she had the money, (not cheap) to get all these tatoos. This is my bias and perhaps you all disagree. Get the butterfly on your butt, if you must, but at least it is covered.
My two cents, take it or leave it, please. If you want body art, so be it, but it might affect your ability to get or maintain employment, self inflicted.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Female First Forum Forum Index -> Stupid Zone All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
terms and conditions Latest Posts


---