Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 3:49 am Post subject: Re: Are LGBT's organizations HATERS?
Fred75 wrote:
noodles wrote:
Fred75 wrote:
Are LGBT's organization HATERS? when they do not allow men and women with the sexual orientation for children and or goats in their organization?
Should their elitist attitude of exclusion to those that are born with the desire to love children and or goats be stopped?
Should we make them accept all non standard sexual orientations into their group?
Name some organisations where the rules state that straight people arnt welcome? As for the goats
It would also be interesting for you to name any reputable and true LGBT organsiation that extends child love to sexual relations.
The 1972 Gay Rights Platform
Platform created at the National Coalition of Gay Organizations Convention held in Chicago in 1972
FEDERAL LEVEL:
1. Amend all federal Civil Rights Acts, other legislation and government controls to prohibit discrimination in employment, housing, public accommodations and public services.
2. Issuance by the President of an executive order prohibiting the military from excluding for reasons of their sexual orientation, persons who of their own volition desire entrance into the Armed Services; and from issuing less-than-fully-honorable discharges for homosexuality; and the upgrading to fully honorable all such discharges previously issued, with retroactive benefits.
3. Issuance by the President of an executive order prohibiting discrimination in the federal civil service because of sexual orientation, in hiring and promoting; and prohibiting discriminations against homosexuals in security clearances.
4. Elimination of tax inequities victimizing single persons and same-sex couples.
5. Elimination of bars to the entry, immigration and naturalization of homosexual aliens.
6. Federal encouragement and support for sex education courses, prepared and taught by gay women and men, presenting homosexuality as a valid, healthy preference and lifestyle as a viable alternative to heterosexuality.
7. Appropriate executive orders, regulations and legislation banning the compiling, maintenance and dissemination of information on an individual's sexual preferences, behavior, and social and political activities for dossiers and data banks.
8. Federal funding of aid programs of gay men's and women's organizations designed to alleviate the problems encountered by Gay women and men which are engendered by an oppressive sexist society.
9. Immediate release of all Gay women and men now incarcerated in detention centers, prisons and mental institutions because of sexual offense charges relating to victimless crimes or sexual orientation; and that adequate compensation be made for the physical and mental duress encountered; and that all existing records relating to the incarceration be immediately expunged.
STATE LEVEL:
1. All federal legislation and programs enumerated in Demands 1, 6, 7, 8, and 9 above should be implemented at the State level where applicable.
2. Repeal of all state laws prohibiting private sexual acts involving consenting persons; equalization for homosexuals and heterosexuals for the enforcement of all laws.
3. Repeal all state laws prohibiting solicitation for private voluntary sexual liaisons; and laws prohibiting prostitution, both male and female.
4. Enactment of legislation prohibiting insurance companies and any other state-regulated enterprises from discriminating because of sexual orientation, in insurance and in bonding or any other prerequisite to employment or control of one's personal demesne.
5. Enactment of legislation so that child custody, adoption, visitation rights, foster parenting, and the like shall not be denied because of sexual orientation or marital status.
6. Repeal of all state laws prohibiting transvestism and cross-dressing.
7. Repeal of all laws governing the age of sexual consent.
8. Repeal of all legislative provisions that restrict the sex or number of persons entering into a marriage unit; and the extension of legal benefits to all persons who cohabit regardless of sex or numbers.
And the ONLY reason that's no longer on todays gay agenda....
Anita Bryant calling you out on it.
7. Repeal of all laws governing the age of sexual consent.
“Repeal of all legislative provisions that restrict the sex or number of persons entering into a marriage unit; and the extension of legal benefits to all persons who cohabit regardless of sex or numbers.”
Ah-hah, caught in another lie, hairy-back? This provision has nothing to do with the “age of consent.” It never did…It never will. You made this up, didn’t you?
Those list of demands are perfectly reasonable. If you happen to read them Fred. The UK has enacted much of that, if not all.
The repeal of the age of consent is NOT referring to having NO AGE OF CONSENT.
It is arguing that the age of consent for HOMOSEXUALS (which was HIGHER - even in the UK) be repealed.
Thus, be brought into line with heterosexuals.
Clearly, this "Anita Bryant" was clearly as much of a dumbfuck as you.
Incredible!
So then... Tell us how young of a boy a 40 year old man can screw in the ass?
Because that's what they are really after... the restrictions of sex between an adult and minor.
If two 14 year olds can legally have sex.... they, at 40, also want a nice tight young 14 year old. PERIOD!
Those list of demands are perfectly reasonable. If you happen to read them Fred. The UK has enacted much of that, if not all.
The repeal of the age of consent is NOT referring to having NO AGE OF CONSENT.
It is arguing that the age of consent for HOMOSEXUALS (which was HIGHER - even in the UK) be repealed.
Thus, be brought into line with heterosexuals.
Clearly, this "Anita Bryant" was clearly as much of a dumbfuck as you.
Incredible!
So then... Tell us how young of a boy a 40 year old man can screw in the ass?
Because that's what they are really after... the restrictions of sex between an adult and minor.
If two 14 year olds can legally have sex.... they, at 40, also want a nice tight young 14 year old. PERIOD!
You haven't read a word have you?
You just haven't read a F****** word.
You can't get basic concepts can you?
You make me more angry than the Islamists did. You don't want to know what happened to them.
Those list of demands are perfectly reasonable. If you happen to read them Fred. The UK has enacted much of that, if not all.
The repeal of the age of consent is NOT referring to having NO AGE OF CONSENT.
It is arguing that the age of consent for HOMOSEXUALS (which was HIGHER - even in the UK) be repealed.
Thus, be brought into line with heterosexuals.
Clearly, this "Anita Bryant" was clearly as much of a dumbfuck as you.
Incredible!
So then... Tell us how young of a boy a 40 year old man can screw in the ass?
Because that's what they are really after... the restrictions of sex between an adult and minor.
If two 14 year olds can legally have sex.... they, at 40, also want a nice tight young 14 year old. PERIOD!
You haven't read a word have you?
You just haven't read a F****** word.
You can't get basic concepts can you?
You make me more angry than the Islamists did. You don't want to know what happened to them.
I don't need to read what you THINK.
All I have to do is look at the Netherlands to see what happens when you allow gay marriage and other liberal ideas to flourish.... You get pedo-political groups petitioning for laws allowing child porn etc...
Site Map
FAQ
Usergroups
Search
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Register
My Profile Space
