Celebrity News...
  1. Lindsay Lohan's happy movies
  2. Oasis fan Liam Gallagher
  3. Victoria Beckham's Spice advice
  4. Colin Farrell's grave drinking
Entertainment...
  1. O.j. Simpson Auctioneer: 'o.j. Didn't Deserve Guilty Verdict'.
  2. Ted Nugent Outlines His Strong Views On World Politics.
  3. Anastacia Will Never Be A Mum.
  4. Douglas Honoured For Playground Fundraising.
Latest Music...
  1. Ironik’s New Single Stay With Me
  2. The Best Of Creedence Clearwater Revival
  3. Black Kids New Album Partie Traumatic
  4. Paul Heaton New Album The Cross Eyed Rambler
Movie Reviews...
  1. Katyn
  2. Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired
  3. The Heckler
  4. Cinema's Action Women


Female First Forum Forum Index
Do You Instill In Your Son: “The All Men Are Dogs,” Ment...
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next  
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Female First Forum Forum Index -> Politics And Social Issues

Do You Instill In Your Son: “The All Men Are Dogs,” Mentality?
Yes.
100%
 100%  [ 3 ]
No.
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Total Votes : 3

Author Message
noodles
FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)


Joined: 04 Sep 2006
Posts: 1901


PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 11:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

coolman wrote:
my oldest is going on his first date soon. I sure hope I taught him to be a dog. . . maybe I should have reminded him one more time. Razz



I take it then that you'd be equally happy for lad to treat your daughter as such?
Back to top
coolman
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 18 Apr 2008
Posts: 7289


PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 11:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

it was tongue-in-cheek, noodles.
Back to top
noodles
FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)


Joined: 04 Sep 2006
Posts: 1901


PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 11:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

coolman wrote:
it was tongue-in-cheek, noodles.


sorry coolman Smile
Back to top
coolman
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 18 Apr 2008
Posts: 7289


PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 11:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

noodles wrote:
coolman wrote:
it was tongue-in-cheek, noodles.


sorry coolman Smile


no problem. By the way, my daughter will get the same sex talk I gave my son.
Back to top
Fred75
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 04 Oct 2007
Posts: 7957


PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 12:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

noodles wrote:
[quote="fred75"So then.. your justification that anyone can raise a child lovingly is because there are bad parents out there?

It wasnt a justification it was fact. im saying that good parents are good needed and worthwhile whatever the background - but then you know thats what i mean Rolling Eyes



A FACT that you implied was reason enough to ignore the needs of the child.


Let's face it... you USED the fact to substantiate your position that a child has no need for a mother and father. You USED it to show that the child only needs love from whatever is better than crap parents.

Well... that's crap logic.
Good logic is DEMANDING GOOD MOTHERS AND FATHERS living in the same house raising the child together.

Not your crap that whoever beats the child less is the better parent.
Back to top
Fred75
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 04 Oct 2007
Posts: 7957


PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 12:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

coolman wrote:
noodles wrote:
coolman wrote:
it was tongue-in-cheek, noodles.


sorry coolman Smile


no problem. By the way, my daughter will get the same sex talk I gave my son.


And what talk is that?
Are you going to tell her th REAL truth as to why YOU dated girls when you were young?

Because why she is going to date is probably not the same as yours was then! Wink
Back to top
noodles
FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)


Joined: 04 Sep 2006
Posts: 1901


PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 1:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fred75 wrote:
noodles wrote:
[quote="fred75"So then.. your justification that anyone can raise a child lovingly is because there are bad parents out there?

It wasnt a justification it was fact. im saying that good parents are good needed and worthwhile whatever the background - but then you know thats what i mean Rolling Eyes



A FACT that you implied was reason enough to ignore the needs of the child.


Let's face it... you USED the fact to substantiate your position that a child has no need for a mother and father. You USED it to show that the child only needs love from whatever is better than crap parents.

Well... that's crap logic.
Good logic is DEMANDING GOOD MOTHERS AND FATHERS living in the same house raising the child together.

Not your crap that whoever beats the child less is the better parent.



Puke It would be really refreshing if someting other than this was to come from you.
Back to top
coolman
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 18 Apr 2008
Posts: 7289


PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 1:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fred75 wrote:
coolman wrote:


no problem. By the way, my daughter will get the same sex talk I gave my son.


And what talk is that?
Are you going to tell her th REAL truth as to why YOU dated girls when you were young?

Because why she is going to date is probably not the same as yours was then! Wink


I think I've already told you about "the talk" I've already had with my son, but probably not all of it.

All the kids will get a variation of the same talk:

1. you are too young.
2. if you do it anyway, use protection
3. pleasuring yourself is normal and nothing to be ashamed of
4. only with explicit consent from both parties

He then asked what I thought about premarital sex. Answer: get as much as possible under the previously stated conditions.

Hell, do I want him to feel guilty about sex? No. My daughter is going on the pill "for cramps" when she turns 13 and will get the exact same talk.
Back to top
ZiaAries
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 14084
Location: United States of America

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 2:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

coolman wrote:


Hell, do I want him to feel guilty about sex? No. My daughter is going on the pill "for cramps" when she turns 13 and will get the exact same talk.


Shocked

Not so cool, man.
Back to top
Fred75
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 04 Oct 2007
Posts: 7957


PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 2:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

noodles wrote:
Fred75 wrote:
noodles wrote:
[quote="fred75"So then.. your justification that anyone can raise a child lovingly is because there are bad parents out there?

It wasnt a justification it was fact. im saying that good parents are good needed and worthwhile whatever the background - but then you know thats what i mean Rolling Eyes



A FACT that you implied was reason enough to ignore the needs of the child.


Let's face it... you USED the fact to substantiate your position that a child has no need for a mother and father. You USED it to show that the child only needs love from whatever is better than crap parents.

Well... that's crap logic.
Good logic is DEMANDING GOOD MOTHERS AND FATHERS living in the same house raising the child together.

Not your crap that whoever beats the child less is the better parent.



Puke It would be really refreshing if someting other than this was to come from you.


Well... Our debate over this some time ago was no different.
There too... you used bad parents to justify your position!
So until you get a good example to compare too... don't expect different! Evil or Very Mad
Back to top
noodles
FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)


Joined: 04 Sep 2006
Posts: 1901


PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 2:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fred75 wrote:
noodles wrote:
Fred75 wrote:
noodles wrote:
[quote="fred75"So then.. your justification that anyone can raise a child lovingly is because there are bad parents out there?

It wasnt a justification it was fact. im saying that good parents are good needed and worthwhile whatever the background - but then you know thats what i mean Rolling Eyes



A FACT that you implied was reason enough to ignore the needs of the child.


Let's face it... you USED the fact to substantiate your position that a child has no need for a mother and father. You USED it to show that the child only needs love from whatever is better than crap parents.

Well... that's crap logic.
Good logic is DEMANDING GOOD MOTHERS AND FATHERS living in the same house raising the child together.

Not your crap that whoever beats the child less is the better parent.



Puke It would be really refreshing if someting other than this was to come from you.


Well... Our debate over this some time ago was no different.
There too... you used bad parents to justify your position!
So until you get a good example to compare too... don't expect different! Evil or Very Mad



I've given you great examples of good parenting , you just choose to ignore them casue they dont fit in your tiny box.
Back to top
coolman
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 18 Apr 2008
Posts: 7289


PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 3:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ZiaAries wrote:
coolman wrote:


Hell, do I want him to feel guilty about sex? No. My daughter is going on the pill "for cramps" when she turns 13 and will get the exact same talk.


Shocked

Not so cool, man.


I simply don't live in lala land.
Back to top
noodles
FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)


Joined: 04 Sep 2006
Posts: 1901


PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 3:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

coolman wrote:
ZiaAries wrote:
coolman wrote:


Hell, do I want him to feel guilty about sex? No. My daughter is going on the pill "for cramps" when she turns 13 and will get the exact same talk.


Shocked

Not so cool, man.


I simply don't live in lala land.



I agree with you. Whilst you can try and steer them away from it and hope that they're not going to experiment until a little older you can never know. I remember that age age and school was a sea of raging hormones. Kids were definitely experimenting at 13 even if it wasnt with penetrative sex.

Information and the knowledge they can come to you about such things (if they want) is really all you can do sometimes.

I think its much more dangerous to presume you know what your kids do and therefore presume such discussions dont need to take place.

I also think its a positive thing to mention exploring yourself. Many girls think they shouldnt thus attaching guilt to it. Letting them know its ok isnt a bad thing (no indepth discussion needed just that its ok)


Last edited by noodles on Tue May 13, 2008 3:14 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Fred75
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 04 Oct 2007
Posts: 7957


PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 3:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

noodles wrote:
Fred75 wrote:
noodles wrote:
Fred75 wrote:
noodles wrote:
[quote="fred75"So then.. your justification that anyone can raise a child lovingly is because there are bad parents out there?

It wasnt a justification it was fact. im saying that good parents are good needed and worthwhile whatever the background - but then you know thats what i mean Rolling Eyes



A FACT that you implied was reason enough to ignore the needs of the child.


Let's face it... you USED the fact to substantiate your position that a child has no need for a mother and father. You USED it to show that the child only needs love from whatever is better than crap parents.

Well... that's crap logic.
Good logic is DEMANDING GOOD MOTHERS AND FATHERS living in the same house raising the child together.

Not your crap that whoever beats the child less is the better parent.



Puke It would be really refreshing if someting other than this was to come from you.


Well... Our debate over this some time ago was no different.
There too... you used bad parents to justify your position!
So until you get a good example to compare too... don't expect different! Evil or Very Mad



I've given you great examples of good parenting , you just choose to ignore them casue they dont fit in your tiny box.


Oh ya!
Now I remember!
All the "parents" that looked better than the abusive/crap parents! Rolling Eyes
Back to top
ZiaAries
FemaleFirst Guru


Joined: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 14084
Location: United States of America

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 3:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

coolman wrote:
ZiaAries wrote:
coolman wrote:


Hell, do I want him to feel guilty about sex? No. My daughter is going on the pill "for cramps" when she turns 13 and will get the exact same talk.


Shocked

Not so cool, man.


I simply don't live in lala land.


I sort of think you are. Cheating on spouses, putting a 13 year old on the pill. That's la la land. Perhaps you should read up on cervical and ovarian cancers before feeding a 13 year old BC pills. Oh well, we receive what we put out. I do think your children should have a fair shot at relationships and understand that it is far more than sex. OR you could just go spay and neuter them like you would a dog. Oh yeah.... they are humans. Don't under estimate kids. That can understand more than we give them credit for.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Female First Forum Forum Index -> Politics And Social Issues All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Page 3 of 8

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
terms and conditions Latest Posts


---