Celebrity News...
  1. Heather Mills' breast dessert
  2. Victoria Beckham's faeces facial
  3. Ronnie Wood's spending spree
  4. Minnie Driver's MySpace son
Entertainment...
  1. Rani Mukherjee To Loose Acting Crown?
  2. Mobo awards nominees and line-up
  3. Queen Latifah’s success marred by brother’s death
  4. Bruce Springsteen rallies for Obama
Latest Music...
  1. Ironik’s New Single Stay With Me
  2. The Best Of Creedence Clearwater Revival
  3. Black Kids New Album Partie Traumatic
  4. Paul Heaton New Album The Cross Eyed Rambler
Movie Reviews...
  1. Katyn
  2. Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired
  3. The Heckler
  4. Cinema's Action Women


Female First Forum Forum Index
Hitting children
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Female First Forum Forum Index -> Parenting
Author Message
Guest







PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 6:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

noodles wrote:

A three year old needs genuine guidance not smacking! Talk to them/tone of voice/threaten to take treats away unless they behave in a way thats acceptable and deserving/let them tanrum and ignore them/take their attention elsewhere/ignore all bad behaviour. There are lots of techniques that can be used.


So stealing their treats is OK but smacking is not?

What sort of example is this setting?
Back to top
Miss V
You Go Girl (100+ Posts)


Joined: 29 Sep 2006
Posts: 160
Location: Toronto

PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 4:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

All children are different. Some need a good smack to keep them in line and some need as little as a time out. There are many methods of discipline and smacking should be allowed to be one of them if necessary.
However it seems strange to me to spank a child still in diapers. I feel that if they can't rationalize when its time to use the bathroom then they cant rationalize the consequenses of their actions. Thus spanking should be the last resort or not used at all in that case.
Back to top
noodles
FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)


Joined: 04 Sep 2006
Posts: 1899


PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 10:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

. wrote:
noodles wrote:

A three year old needs genuine guidance not smacking! Talk to them/tone of voice/threaten to take treats away unless they behave in a way thats acceptable and deserving/let them tanrum and ignore them/take their attention elsewhere/ignore all bad behaviour. There are lots of techniques that can be used.


So stealing their treats is OK but smacking is not?

What sort of example is this setting?



Ok ok - what i meant was dont give them treats if they misbehave - of course i wouldnt endorse giving them something and taking it away again Shocked
Back to top
Guest







PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 1:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i could never hit my child. I remember how aweful it was from my parents. No child should have to deal with a parents anger like that.

Mad
Back to top
Guest







PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 7:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

. wrote:
i could never hit my child. I remember how aweful it was from my parents. No child should have to deal with a parents anger like that.

Mad


I'm really sorry to hear that.
No child should be smacked in anger and it's sometimes very difficult to avoid it.
I smack my children. It's a measured response, generally on the hand, leg or bottom and with my fingers. They are 3 and 5 years old. The force I use is very controlled and is designed to give a quick reprisal, never a lasting pain. As my boys know I'm not bluffing, a threat of a smack is frequently enough to establish discipline. That's much better than actually doing it. I've taught them self control and self discipline. There are times when they push too far though and that's when they get smacked. As I say, the smack is very controlled and measured.
Back to top
Guest







PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 12:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

. wrote:
. wrote:
i could never hit my child. I remember how aweful it was from my parents. No child should have to deal with a parents anger like that.

Mad


I'm really sorry to hear that.
No child should be smacked in anger and it's sometimes very difficult to avoid it.
I smack my children. It's a measured response, generally on the hand, leg or bottom and with my fingers. They are 3 and 5 years old. The force I use is very controlled and is designed to give a quick reprisal, never a lasting pain. As my boys know I'm not bluffing, a threat of a smack is frequently enough to establish discipline. That's much better than actually doing it. I've taught them self control and self discipline. There are times when they push too far though and that's when they get smacked. As I say, the smack is very controlled and measured.


As far as i am concern regardless if it is a measured smack or not it is still as mack and more importantly it is assault and you can be charge for it under the law. A adult wouldn't hit another adult so why should a child be any different.
Back to top
noodles
FemaleFirst Grand Master (1000+ Posts)


Joined: 04 Sep 2006
Posts: 1899


PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 12:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i give mine emotional punishments - lots of put downs and things to make them realise they are in the wrong and how bad they are to behave in certain ways - for example if my daughter runs in the road, i tell her what a 'stupid irresponsible diabolical child she is'. if my son hits his sister i tell him very calmly that he is a 'bullying idiot and that only arseholes behave this way' its all measured tho imo so thats ok i wreckon. whatever.
Back to top
Guest







PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 6:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Laughing
Back to top
Guest







PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 6:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As far as i am concern regardless if it is a measured smack or not it is still as mack and more importantly it is assault and you can be charge for it under the law. A adult wouldn't hit another adult so why should a child be any different.[/quote]

It's not illegal in England.

As I've said before, adult punishment doesn't work on children. If I do wrong, the court hearing could be months after the crime and I could be imprisoned. Try doing that to a 3 year old. They won't know why they're being punished and locking them in their room for weeks is cruelty.
The punishment must fit the deed and the individual. Children are not adults and cannot be treated as such.
Back to top
Guest







PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote=".]
As far as i am concern regardless if it is a measured smack or not it is still as mack and more importantly it is assault and you can be charge for it under the law. A adult wouldn't hit another adult so why should a child be any different.[/quote]

If I see an adult walking along a busy road or using a sharp knife or a power saw, I wouldn't take any action. So why should a child be any different?
Back to top
Jon Phoenix Brookstone
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 3:45 am    Post subject: Why Hitting Is Wrong Reply with quote

To those who think that "smacking" their kids and "beating" their kids are different things, consider using a dictionary:

Smack ~ to strike
Beat ~ To strike

Interesting how Oxford classified both as the same thing. So stop trying to argue that they're different because they aren't. And in the eyes of the child you're hitting, that difference won't matter. What will matter is that the person they used to think they could rely on is causing them pain.

And FYI ~ most kids do not develop the cognitive capacity to discern right and wrong, and the fact that other people have feelings until age six or seven (look up Jean Piaget). Why parents don't ever learn cognitive psychology before they have kids is beyond me.

And FYI ~ 18 years down the road ~ hit a kid enough, they won't forget it. And if they're smart enough, they just might end up leaving you permanently for your history of pad parenting. And you'll be left one sorry pile of remorse without your own kids loving you.

Don't believe me, ask my parents. Very Happy
Back to top
Guest







PostPosted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 2:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Its Dare!! wrote:
Well, my son is only 11 weeks old, but when the time comes and hes being really naughtly and won't behave, i will be administering discipline with a little smack here and there!! I only ever had two big smacks in my childhood, both given for bad behaviour, both remembered well and the lesson learnt!!


I suggest you go to parent school and learn how to discipline your child with out resorting to smacking.
Back to top
Jbabe
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:24 pm    Post subject: Hitting children Reply with quote

Mad Sad
I totally disagree with hitting a child .. there is no sense and no point behind it .. all you are doing is making yourself look bad .. i think that it is perthetic and i think that anyone who does deserves to be locked up .. There are lots of other ways of disciplining your children
Thanks fro reading
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Female First Forum Forum Index -> Parenting All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Page 4 of 4

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
terms and conditions Latest Posts